Sphericality of Existence
Rethinking the Complexity of Being Beyond the Classification Paradox
Keywords:
Ontology, Sphericality Paradigm, Ontological Multidimensionality, Classification Paradox, Cognitive Flexibility, Knowledge in the Age of Artificial Intelligence, Identity and Perception DynamiAbstract
This study proposes the Sphericality Paradigm as a novel epistemological framework to address the limitations of classification systems that dominate contemporary science, education, social life, and digital environments. While classification promises order and efficiency, it often fragments the fluid, relational, and evolving nature of human identity and knowledge. Drawing from cognitive science, philosophy, sociology, and complexity theory, the paradigm reframes existence not as a fixed essence but as a dynamic sphere of becoming—where perception, relation, and potential continuously co-construct reality. The study articulates eight foundational principles of Sphericality: multidimensionality, transitionality, contextuality, relationality, potentiality, perceptual multiplicity, layered reality, and uniqueness. These principles are applied to critique and reimagine institutional systems—including education, science, law, politics, and digital platforms—through design alternatives grounded in pluralism, fluidity, and co-creation. Grounded in theoretical synthesis, the study develops a generative heuristic model through philosophical integration and metaphorical modeling. It aims to inspire epistemological transformation by cultivating cognitive flexibility, ontological openness, and systemic imagination. In an era defined by algorithmic reduction and epistemic rigidity, the Sphericality Paradigm offers a timely and generative alternative for rethinking human potential and the architectures of knowledge.
References
Appiah, K. A. (2006). Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a world of strangers. W. W. Norton & Company.
Aristotle. (1984). Categories (J. L. Ackrill, Trans.). In J. Barnes (Ed.), The complete works of Aristotle: The revised Oxford translation (Vol. 1, pp. 3–24). Princeton University Press.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822388128
Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation (S. F. Glaser, Trans.). University of Michigan Press. (Original work published 1981)
Beane, J. A. (1997). Curriculum integration: Designing the core of democratic education. Teachers College Press.
Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. Free Press.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books.
Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. Routledge.
Biagioli, M., & Lippman, A. (Eds.). (2003). Scientific authorship: Credit and intellectual property in science. Routledge.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Paradigm Publishers.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Prentice-Hall.
Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature (R. Johnson, Ed.). Columbia University Press.
Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6352.001.0001
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
Butler, J. (2004). Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. Verso.
Capra, F. (1996). The web of life: A new scientific understanding of living systems. Anchor Books.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Harvard University Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1980)
Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and difference (A. Bass, Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 1967)
Doolittle, W. F. (1999). Phylogenetic classification and the universal tree. Science, 284(5423), 2124–2129. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5423.2124
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
Erdoğan, İ. (1998). Bilgi toplumu olmanın gerektirdiği eğitim paradigması. Yeni Türkiye, (19), 870–876.
Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. Verso.
Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. Tavistock Publications. (Original work published 1966)
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Pantheon Books. (Original work published 1975)
Fuller, L. L. (1964). The morality of law. Yale University Press.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentice-Hall.
Gülalp, H. (2003). Kimlikler siyaseti. Metis Yayınları.
Gutiérrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032005019
Güven, S. (2019). Eğitimde standardizasyonun bireysel farklılıklara etkisi: Eleştirel bir yaklaşım. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 25(3), 423–444. https://doi.org/10.14527/kuey.2019.016
Hacking, I. (1990). The taming of chance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819766
Hanage, W. P. (2013). Fuzzy species revisited. BMC Biology, (11), Article 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-11-41
Haraway, D. J. (1991). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 149–181). Routledge.
Heisenberg, W. (1958). Physics and philosophy: The revolution in modern science. Harper & Brothers.
Hull, D. L. (1988). Science as a process: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. University of Chicago Press.
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), Article e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Linnaeus, C. (1735). Systema naturae, sive regna tria naturae systematice proposita per classes, ordines, genera, & species. Theodorus Haak.
Lorenz, E. N. (1993). The essence of chaos. University of Washington Press.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans.). Manchester University Press. (Original work published 1979)
Merton, R. K. (1948). The self-fulfilling prophecy. The Antioch Review, 8(2), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.2307/4609267
Mishler, B. D., & Donoghue, M. J. (1982). Species concepts: A case for pluralism. Systematic Zoology, 31(4), 491–503. https://doi.org/10.2307/2413371
Morin, E. (2008). On complexity. Hampton Press.
Mounk, Y. (2018). The people vs. democracy: Why our freedom is in danger and how to save it. Harvard University Press.
Moustakas, C. (1990). Heuristic research: Design, methodology, and applications. SAGE Publications.
Nietzsche, F. (1999). On truth and lie in an extra-moral sense (D. Breazeale, Trans.). In D. Breazeale (Ed.), Philosophy and truth: Selections from Nietzsche’s notebooks of the early 1870s (pp. 79–91). Humanity Books. (Original work written 1873)
Noddings, N. (2013). Education and democracy in the 21st century. Teachers College Press.
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. Penguin Press.
Plato. (1997). Complete works (J. M. Cooper, Ed., & D. S. Hutchinson, Associate Ed.). Hackett Publishing Company.
Riso, D. R., & Hudson, R. (1996). Personality types: Using the Enneagram for self-discovery (Rev. ed.). Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Robinson, K. (2006). Do schools kill creativity? [Video]. TED Conferences. Retrieved June 30, 2025, from https://www.ted.com/talks/ken_robinson_do_schools_kill_creativity
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford University Press.
Rose, T., Rouhani, P., & Fischer, K. W. (2013). The science of the individual. Mind, Brain, and Education, 7(3), 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12021
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.
Sousa, D. A. (2016). How the brain learns (5th ed.). Corwin Press.
Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). University of Illinois Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge University Press.
Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press.
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus logico-philosophicus (C. K. Ogden, Trans.). Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co. (Original work published 1921)
Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2021). Alternatif epistemolojiler ve eğitim araştırmalarına etkileri. Eğitim ve Bilim, 46(207), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2021.9876
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 İsmet Şahin (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright of their work.
All content published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
